Linguistic Camouflage and the Reform Party
What’s in a name?
I have a problem with the UK political party that has calculatedly called itself Reform. The name is calibrated to suggest something forward-looking… something soothing and constructive…safe even: A renewal of democratic life. It is no such creature.
Their ideology sits squarely on the hard-right, with informal ties across Europe to parties whose roots are openly nationalist and from fascist traditions. Reform’s dubious alliances mirror the broader pan-European rebranding of the far right — Marine Le Pen’s “Rassemblement National,” Italy’s “Brothers of Italy,” even “Alternative für Deutschland.” Each deploy words that sound civic and unthreatening but which shelter illiberal ideologies that eschew inclusivity in preference for repressive white nationalism.
The word “Reform” evokes unconscious positive associations; renewal, progress, democratic improvement. It’s semantic camouflage… language chosen not to reflect truth, but to manipulate perception. It’s a political sleight of hand, a borrowing of the moral credibility of historical reform movements (like the Reform Acts of the 19th century, which expanded suffrage).
And we’ve seen this playbook before. The “National Socialists” in 1930s Germany were neither national in the inclusive sense nor socialist in the egalitarian one. Their name was a deception — one that lulled a divided public into believing they stood for renewal, when in fact they stood for domination and exclusion.
The name helped to disarm working-class Germans and centrist voters alike, who might otherwise have been skeptical; suggesting reform and solidarity while delivering dictatorship and racial purity ideology.
When modern far-right movements brand themselves with benign or even hopeful language: Reform, Freedom, Patriot, Voice, Alternative, Identity, they are deploying what we could call linguistic laundering: wrapping exclusionary or authoritarian politics in words that sound soothingly constructive and democratic.
Both the Reform Party and the far right rump (of what tatters remain) of the Conservative Party have now parked their tanks on the far right, promising (as if it’s desirable) to bring the same kinds of military chaos and fear-mongering Trump is attempting in the US with his ICE agents, normalising the arbitrary terrorising of communities that vote Democrat.
We really must be wiser than to succumb to a branding exercise that conceals rather than reveals.
